Please help on this penalized site!

[palicomp]

Hi Marcus, i agree, sure, in detail:

• built high quality natural link profile with varied anchor text since Aug

• provided a text document of removed links (about 12 - 15% of WMT/OSE/Ahrefs link profile) in recon request

• provided a list of every directory and bad looking forum links, irrelevant websites in disavow tool by domain:

• made a simple text copy on google docs of disavow in recon request.

• apologised on behalf of work done by previous companies

• promised all future work will be compliant to webmaster standards.

I have ran several audits since working with Palicomp, everything from canonicalisation to crawl errors to dupe content and ive found a small amount of source code duplicates (down to cubecarts awful cms) but not much else

[Brian-H]

I think Marcus is trying to say check duplicate content comparing to other sites with tools such as copyscape and that if you have done all the basics then you may need a second opinion with a full audit and review.

[palicomp]

Hi Brian, will definately look at this thanks, i know that our duplicate issues across the site are slim and other onpage things - massive increase in site loading times etc etc are going well, thanks

[Brian-H]

Site load times and duplicate content between pages are not things that would get a violate google guidelines warning.

Duplicate content or thin content will hold you back and class you as a low quality site but I think google is more saying that you are doing bad things such as link wheels, manipulating PR, spam linking, copying content from sites etc.

[palicomp]

so far copyscape/plagspotter has shown nothing, website has been changed since the warning came in and a lot of content was changed. i feel that one issue might be down to the enjin.com list of forums that run one forum but span hundreds of websites with different layouts (horrid spam that wasnt actually created by bad seo's!)  ive been asking for ages to get this removed and its all been filed into our disavow. Like i said i think 90%+ of our backlinks across WMT/ahrefs/OSE have been requested to disavow.

None of our blog content has been duplicated but this is new and didnt exist when the unnatural warning was issued, its just so frustrating how i feel we have covered every angle and you find most of your working life becoming a minion to the google algorithmn!

[palicomp]

Just an update Marcus - this morning we got our "manual spam penalty revoked" notice so lets see if rankings return.

[Marcus_Miller]

Hey Peter, that's great news, keep us posted on how that works out from a traffic perspective and would love a poke around in your analytics once the dust has settled.

Cheers,

Marcus

[palicomp]

thanks Marcus, we have whilst trying to remove the bad replace with good and get white hat all the way, so my biggest worry now is too see how much recovery actually happens, the general consensus seems to be anywhere between 10 - 90 days!

Chris

[Marcus_Miller]

Hey Chris (peter? sorry)

Yeah, will be interesting, every case is unique I figure but certainly, if you get rid of the problems you can at least concentrate on moving forwards.

Keep me posted.

[palicomp]

Absolutely, our rankings have been static since i started so i hope we will see some results soonish will keep you posted.

Chris

Ps - Peter owns the business and set our Moz account up! i do the work! hah

[Marcus_Miller]

Ha, okay, got it!

Go after some long tail content and start adding some value to the site and you should have a broader scope and some pages that will rank on their own merit. Gives you something constructive to do and some possible link targets!