The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4. Hidden Content with "clip"

    Hidden Content with "clip"

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4 2 469
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • zeepartner
      zeepartner last edited by

      Hi

      We're relaunching a site with a Drupal 7 CMS. Our web agency has hidden content on it and they say it's for Accessibility (I don't see the use myself, though). Since they ask for more cash in order to remove it, the management is unsure. So I wanted to check if anyone knows whether this could hurt us in search engines.

      There is a field in the HTML where you can skip to the main content:

      Skip to main content

      The corresponding CSS comes here:

      .element-invisible{position:absolute !important;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);clip:rect(1px,1px,1px,1px);}

      #skip-link a,#skip-link a:visited{position:absolute;display:block;left:0;top:-500px;width:1px;height:1px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;background-color:#666;color:#fff;}

      The crucial point is that they're hiding the text "skip to main content", using clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px), which shrinks the text to one pixel. So IMO this is hiding content. How bad is it?

      PS: Hope the source code is sufficient. Ask me if you need more. Thx!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • EGOL
        EGOL last edited by

        I would be really really really really mad if they did this to me.

        they say it's for Accessibility

        This is such BS...  (they know they are full of BS and they are so dumb that they think they can make you believe that it is chocolate)

        Since they ask for more cash in order to remove it

        Weasels!

        zeepartner 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • zeepartner
          zeepartner @EGOL last edited by

          thanx for confirming EGOL... yup, they are indeed crooks, but the contract was set-up quite badly. At least I could get them to add the clause that the website should use "semantic markup". so I hope i can kick their behinds with this instead of pay for a decent website!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • zeepartner
            zeepartner last edited by

            ..although I should add that it is indeed normal to have the possibility to skip content for visually impaired users (an accessibility organisation confirmed this). I'm just not sure what the best practice to do it is and I seriously don't like reducing content to 1 pixel.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • 1 / 1
            • First post
              Last post
            • Backlink "class=X-hidden-focus"
              bendroid
              bendroid
              0
              2
              193

            • Does Google View "SRC", "HREF", TITLE and Alt tags as Duplicate Content on Home Page Slider?
              Cyrus-Shepard
              Cyrus-Shepard
              0
              2
              711

            • "No Index, No Follow" or No Index, Follow" for URLs with Thin Content?
              PaddyDisplays
              PaddyDisplays
              0
              4
              1.4k

            • Subcategories within "New Arrivals" section - duplicate content?
              OlegKorneitchouk
              OlegKorneitchouk
              0
              2
              110

            • Google's Stance on "Hidden" Content
              Cyrus-Shepard
              Cyrus-Shepard
              0
              5
              191

            • Using "Read More" buttons as a tool to cram in Content
              Martin_Harris
              Martin_Harris
              0
              2
              321

            • Meta name="canonical" content="uRL" usage instead of link rel
              Ideas-Money-Art
              Ideas-Money-Art
              0
              10
              4.7k

            • Is it possible to "undo" canonical tags as unique content is created?
              Dr-Pete
              Dr-Pete
              0
              3
              392

            Get started with Moz Pro!

            Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

            Start my free trial
            Products
            • Moz Pro
            • Moz Local
            • Moz API
            • Moz Data
            • STAT
            • Product Updates
            Moz Solutions
            • SMB Solutions
            • Agency Solutions
            • Enterprise Solutions
            • Digital Marketers
            Free SEO Tools
            • Domain Authority Checker
            • Link Explorer
            • Keyword Explorer
            • Competitive Research
            • Brand Authority Checker
            • Local Citation Checker
            • MozBar Extension
            • MozCast
            Resources
            • Blog
            • SEO Learning Center
            • Help Hub
            • Beginner's Guide to SEO
            • How-to Guides
            • Moz Academy
            • API Docs
            About Moz
            • About
            • Team
            • Careers
            • Contact
            Why Moz
            • Case Studies
            • Testimonials
            Get Involved
            • Become an Affiliate
            • MozCon
            • Webinars
            • Practical Marketer Series
            • MozPod
            Connect with us

            Contact the Help team

            Join our newsletter
            Moz logo
            © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
            • Accessibility
            • Terms of Use
            • Privacy